Our highly credentialed vocational rehabilitation and life care plan experts write about topics that are important and relevant to our areas of practice. If you have a vocational or life care planning topic you would like to learn more about, please contact us to request a blog post on that topic.
Life Care Plan Considerations for Headache and Migraine Management
Managing migraine headaches, whether due to post-concussive syndrome or other causes, often requires a long-term approach supported by a well-structured life care plan. Migraines are recurring neurological disorders characterized by moderate to severe throbbing pain, typically on one side of the head. Common symptoms include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, visual disturbances, and heightened sensitivity to light, sound, and smell.
Some patients also experience a "migraine aura" before the onset of a headache, involving sensory changes such as flashing lights, ringing in the ears, or numbness and tingling, often on one side of the body—most commonly affecting the hand, arm, face, lips, or tongue. It is crucial to distinguish migraines from other headache types, such as tension-type, cluster, or rebound headaches, as each requires a unique treatment approach.
Key Considerations in Developing a Life Care Plan
When creating a life care plan for migraine management, collaboration with a neurologist or headache specialist is essential to ensure effective treatment recommendations. The field of headache medicine is constantly evolving, and available interventions may include:
Over-the-counter and prescription medications
Procedures and injections
Intravenous (IV) infusions
Wearable medical devices
Alternative therapies
Treatment Options
Medications
Over-the-counter and prescription medications are often the first line of defense. These may come in various forms, such as tablets, capsules, orally disintegrating tablets, liquids, nasal sprays, or powders. Injectable medications, such as Ajovy, Aimovig, and Emgality, are also widely used.Procedures and Injections
Interventions like occipital nerve blocks and Botox injections are commonly recommended for migraine and headache management.Intravenous Infusions
IV treatments, such as ketamine infusions, are gaining acceptance as effective options for managing chronic migraines.Wearable Devices
Devices like Nerivio, a remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) device, and other nerve stimulators are often prescribed after trial and error with more traditional methods.Alternative Therapies
Acupuncture has been shown to be a safe and effective complementary treatment for migraine relief.
Developing a Comprehensive Plan
To create an effective life care plan, life care planners should work closely with treating or consulting physicians or headache specialists. A thorough understanding of current treatment options and the patient's prognosis is essential to tailor a comprehensive, individualized plan that meets their specific needs.
New Frontiers in Life Care Planning
Life care planning, once primarily focused on medical needs and financial implications for catastrophic injuries, is evolving to address a broader spectrum when planning for long-term care.
One emerging area is the integration of mental health into life care plans. Conditions such as chronic depression, anxiety, and trauma can significantly impact an individual's quality of life and care needs. The importance of incorporating mental health services, including therapy and medication management, are services being increasingly included in comprehensive life care plans. This holistic approach ensures that the psychological well-being of the individual is prioritized alongside their physical health.
Another development is a growing emphasis on aging populations. This includes incorporating services like geriatric care management. Additionally, there is a focus on maintaining independence and quality of life for seniors through assistive technology, home modifications, and community-based support systems.
The intersection of technology and life care planning is also a rapidly expanding field. Telemedicine and remote monitoring devices are transforming how care is delivered and monitored. These technologies can enhance communication between healthcare providers, improve patient outcomes, and provide valuable data for life care planning. Moreover, artificial intelligence is being explored to analyze large datasets and identify potential care needs, leading to more personalized and proactive planning.
Finally, life care planning is extending beyond individuals, to include families and communities. Recognizing the impact of caregiving on family members, life care plans are beginning to incorporate support services for caregivers, such as respite care, counseling, and education. Additionally, there is a growing awareness of the role of community resources in supporting individuals with long-term care needs.
Life care planning is experiencing a transformative period. By addressing emerging areas such as mental health, aging, technology, and family and community support, life care planners are better equipped to meet the complex and evolving needs of individuals and families. This holistic approach to life care planning will ultimately help improve quality of life and ensure that individuals receive the support they need throughout their lifespan.
Scope of Practice for Life Care Planners
Certified life care planners adhere to a well-defined, peer-reviewed, and generally accepted set of professional standards and guidelines (“Standards).[1] The standards require that items in a life care plan be causally related to the indexed incident and have sufficient medical foundation. To this end, life care planners are required to consult with treating and/or consulting physicians to obtain medical recommendations that are translated into life care plan items. Consistent with this logic, life care planners should rely on medical professionals who are making recommendations within their specific scope of practice. For example, it would be inappropriate to ask a cardiologist for recommendations for future kidney dialysis. This would of course strain the credibility of the recommendation and likely violate certain rules of evidence.
Occasionally, treating physicians are unavailable for consultation for a variety of reasons, which may necessitate involvement of a consulting physician. This provider would presumably conduct a physical examination if possible and review relevant treatment records. The life care planner could then collaborate with the consultant for recommendations regarding future care. Again, it would be inappropriate to ask this consultant for recommendations outside of their scope of practice like the example above.
But what happens when the consulting physician is also acting as the life care planner who is costing out their own medical recommendations? While it may be convenient or beneficial at times to combine these different roles, there are inherent concerns which may jeopardize the admissibility of their opinions. For example, we routinely review life care plans generated by physicians who do not consult with the treating doctors and base their entire life care plans on their own recommendations. This practice is acceptable when the physician life care planner is making recommendations specific to their medical specialty. The Standards state that the life care planner “Seeks recommendations from other qualified professionals and/or relevant sources for inclusion of items and services outside the life care planner’s scope of practice (p.17).” Routinely we see physician life care planners offering recommendations outside of their professional scope. Most frequently, we see recommendations by physiatrists (physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists) for orthopedic surgery, detailed ongoing psychological or mental health treatment, routine neurology follow ups, or other ongoing routine care that would otherwise require the input of the specialist providing the care.
A recent federal court decision for the Western District of Missouri involved a motion to exclude the plaintiff’s expert physician life care planner based on a Daubert challenge, which was granted[2]. In this case, plaintiff’s counsel hired a physiatrist to produce a life care plan. According to the ruling, the physiatrist’s testimony did not meet the standards for evidence to be admissible under Rule 702, which states that an expert “must show by a preponderance of the evidence both that the expert is qualified to render the opinion and that the methodology underlying his conclusions is scientifically valid.”
The decision added that the defense challenged the qualifications of the expert, his methodologies, and the reliability of his opinions. Defendants stated that the physiatrist opined that ongoing treatment was necessary in a specialty for which he or she had little to no knowledge or experience. The defendant also contended that the physiatrist did not speak with the patient’s treating physicians. Accordingly, the physiatrist affirmed that his opinions were not based on medical records, a review of literature, or conversations with the patient’s treating physicians. The court concluded there must be support in the medical records, from a treating specialist, or other expert in that specialty for the physiatrist’s opinions to be reliable. As the court stated, “merely possessing a medical degree is not sufficient to permit a physician to testify concerning any medical-related issue.” Furthermore, the physiatrist admitted that he lacks the expertise to determine costs of future medical care and leaves the process of doing so to the “actuary department.”
In order to ensure that we provide credible, valid, and defensible reports, we endeavor to confirm that the medical foundation underlying our plans falls within the generally accepted professional standards that guide our work. We are also mindful of the important legal standards that govern the ultimate admissibility of our opinions.
[1] IARP/Life Care Planning IALCP Section (2022). Standards of Practice for Life Care Planners (4th Ed.). IARP.
[2] Hartley v. Kawasaki Motors. USDC for W. Div, St. Joseph Division, Case No. 20-06098-CV-SJ-GAF (2022)
Stokes & Associates Experts Publish in Seminal New Textbook: Handbook of Medical Aspects of Disability and Rehabilitation for Life Care Planning
The grassroots of life care planning can be traced back to the mid to late 1970’s that evolved out of case management with concepts, methodologies, and tenets in the field of rehabilitation counseling. Today, life care plans are utilized in many personal injury cases for forensic purposes to outline the future medical and related needs of an individual as the result of an injury or illness along with associated costs of that care. The life care planning process has a strong medically-based element for determining the medical and rehabilitative needs of an injured individual.
Out of a desire to provide opportunity for practicing life care planners to review and obtain a re-understanding of the medical aspects of injury they learned early in their studies, Drs. Virgil Robert May III, Richard Bowman, and Steven Barna recently published a text in May 2024, entitled, “Handbook of Medical Aspects of Disability and Rehabilitation for Life Care Planning”.1
Contributors to this textbook came from a team of various experts, including medical and doctoral level practitioners, covering key areas of traumatic injury and resulting disability that are often faced by life care planners. The book is comprised of 22 chapters, encompassing a variety of topics, including but not limited to:
independent medical evaluations,
psychosocial aspects of chronic illness and disability,
the pediatric life care and vocational evaluation,
acquired brain injury,
traumatic brain injury,
traumatic spinal cord injury,
amputations,
pain medicine and life care planning,
burn trauma,
the medical cost projection.
The chapter entitled “Third-Party Provider Systems” was written by our very own Vocational and Life Care Plan experts, Larry S. Stokes, Aaron M. Wolfson, Todd S. Capielano, Lacy H. Sapp, and Ashley G. Lastrapes. In this chapter, they discuss disability and work; impairment ratings; state, federal, Jones Act, longshore and harbor worker’ compensation, as well as Social Security Administration. We want to acknowledge their hard work, research, and dedication to their contribution to this book publication.
Please feel free to contact our office to discuss the chapter.
Appropriate Funding of Services in Life Care Planning
A primary objective of a life care plan is to appropriately fund future medical treatment related to a specific injury or incident. The plan should neither overfund nor underfund necessary items and services. When developing a life care plan, it's crucial to consider the potential overlapping of services to prevent "double dipping," which can lead to overfunding. Conversely, underfunding can occur if the entire cost of a service is not accounted for.
Overfunding Example: Consider an individual with a traumatic brain injury who lives at home and requires 24-hour attendant care. If this person also needs inpatient rehabilitation, the cost of attendant care should be deducted during the inpatient rehabilitation period. Another example involves medication needs. If an individual is already prescribed a once-daily muscle relaxer but will require it three times daily following a recommended surgery, the life care planner should only fund the additional two doses during the post-operative period.
Avoiding Underfunding: To prevent underfunding, a life care planner must consider the entire cost of each recommendation. For instance, when accounting for surgery costs, the planner should obtain all associated expenses, including:
Physician fees
Assistant physician/surgeon fees (if needed)
Facility fees
Anesthesia fees
Hardware/implant fees (if applicable)
Neuromonitoring fees (if necessary)
Additionally, the life care planner must factor in all pre- and post-operative treatment costs, such as:
Pre-operative labs and diagnostics
Post-operative physician follow-up visits
Physical therapy
Medications
Imaging
Another example is the recommendation of a power wheelchair. Beyond the initial cost, the life care planner should consider expenses for:
Wheelchair maintenance
Battery replacements
Necessary accessories
It is standard practice in life care planning to evaluate how one recommendation may affect others. Life care planners should thoroughly assess each recommendation to account for potential service overlaps or to ensure the entire cost of each service or item is included.
By adhering to these principles, life care planners can create more accurate and comprehensive plans that appropriately fund the future medical needs of injured individuals.
Case Study: Life Care Planning and Hand Injuries
John, a 35-year-old construction worker, suffered a severe hand injury in a workplace accident, resulting in the amputation of three fingers on his dominant hand. The injury has left him unable to perform his job and carry out daily activities.
A life care planner is brought in to assess John's situation and develop a comprehensive life care plan. The planner consults with John's hand surgeon and a pain management specialist to understand the extent of his injuries and future medical needs. They recommend ongoing pain management, occupational therapy, and potential future surgeries to improve hand function.
The life care planner also assesses John's need for assistive devices and adaptive tools to help him regain independence in daily activities. They recommend a prosthetic device for his missing fingers and training on how to use it effectively. Additionally, the planner identifies the need for vocational rehabilitation to help John explore new career options that accommodate his injury.
The life care plan outlines all of John's anticipated future medical expenses, including surgeries, therapies, medications, assistive devices, and vocational rehabilitation. This comprehensive plan helps John and his legal team understand the long-term financial impact of his injury and seek appropriate compensation.
By addressing John's medical, functional, and vocational needs, the life care plan helps him navigate the challenges of living with a hand injury and maximize his quality of life.
Life Care Plan Considerations for Hearing Impairments
Life care planners are routinely engaged for cases involving clients who require hearing aids and assistive technology due to injury-related hearing loss. There are two main types of hearing loss:
1. Conductive hearing loss: Caused by obstructions in the outer or middle ear, often treatable with medication or surgery.
2. Sensorineural hearing loss: Caused by inner ear or auditory nerve damage, typically permanent. Often seen in life care planning cases involving explosions or head trauma.
Life care planners should consult with audiologists and/or ENTs to obtain recommendations for current and future treatment needs. For significant sensorineural hearing loss requiring hearing aids, life care plans must specify the type (receiver-in-ear, behind-the-ear, or invisible-in-canal), which may require custom ear molds at additional cost. Hearing aid fittings, routine cleaning, and re-programming appointments should also be considered. Ongoing audiologist follow-ups and hearing tests are necessary as hearing loss can progress over time. It is important to ensure that life care planners inquire about hearing aid warranties and replacement schedules.
For work/school accommodations, consider additional assistive technology that pairs with hearing aids, such as:
Roger Clip-On Mics for direct feed from speakers/presenters
Personal amplifiers to increase sound levels and reduce background noise in various environments.
Life care plans must also include replacement batteries for hearing aids and assistive technology, if not rechargeable.
In some cases, an ENT evaluation may be required before hearing aid fitting, especially if testing reveals hearing loss asymmetry, which could indicate neuromas or other inner ear/brain trauma requiring further diagnostics. If the client also experiences dizziness, balance issues, or tinnitus, additional care from a neuro-otologist or vestibular therapist may be warranted.
Future Cost Considerations for Organ Transplants
Forecasting the complicated medical needs of individuals leading up to and following organ transplants requires careful attention to detail. Organ transplant candidates are often some of the most acutely ill evaluees life care planners encounter. These patients require vigilant medical surveillance prior to transplant, must endure the stress and fear of being taken off the waiting list, and must be close enough to a transplant center to respond to available transplant organs at a moment’s notice. Given the complexity of the transplant surgery itself, the iatrogenic effects of lifetime immunosuppressant medications, and the multitude of potential complications, collecting reliable cost estimates for transplants can be challenging.
The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) is a private, non-profit organization that manages the national organ transplant system. UNOS through its Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), matches donors to recipients, manages the waiting lists, develops policies, evaluates procedures, and most importantly, maintains a database on every transplant performed in the United States. This comprehensive database allows for detailed research regarding the typical costs for single-organ, double-organ, or tissue transplants.
Milliman is an independent risk management, benefits, and technology firm that publishes the most comprehensive analysis of transplant costs in the United States. The firm issues an updated study every three years, with the most recent being published in January of 2020. The Milliman report includes transplant costs that cover the 30-day period prior to the transplant, the cost for organ procurement, the cost of the actual transplant (includes medical and hospital fees), and the costs associated with the first 180 days following the transplant. The report presents costs in several ways including the PMPM (per member per month) and the “billed” charge. It is the billed charge that is appropriate for use according to generally accepted standards of practice for life care planning.
As costs are limited to specific pre- and post-transplant time frames, it is important to collaborate with the treating or consulting specialist to address likely costs that extend beyond the 180 days after transplant. As mentioned in a previous post, issues such as organ rejection, infectious diseases, and side effects of immunosuppressant medications, can put organ recipients in the position of “trading one disease for another.” Additionally, the issue of mortality rates and life expectancy following transplants requires strong medical foundation and consultation.
Life care planning for transplant cases can be complicated. Future care involves multiple bodily systems, frequent medical complications, and varied side effects from the lifelong medications required to avoid organ rejection. It takes an experienced team to accurately plan for and reliably research the cost of future care.
Amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702- Expert Witness Testimony
Life Care Plan Expert testifying expert rule 702
Effective December 1, 2023, Federal Rule of Evidence 702 underwent amendments aimed at clarifying how trial judges determine the admissibility of expert testimony. The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules identified issues related to interpreting and applying Rule 702 language, prompting these changes. The amendments aim to assist in qualifying and admitting expert witnesses.
Key Points:
Purpose of Amendments: The amendments address the reliability of expert testimony. Previously, judges allowed juries to assess information’s reliability. Under the Daubert standard, an expert was qualified if they followed a method and applied it to the facts.
Main Clarification: Qualified experts may testify if the proponent demonstrates to the court that:
It is “more likely than not” that the expert’s specialized knowledge, data, and analysis will help the trier(s) of fact understand the issue.
The opinion is based on sufficient facts or data.
The principles and methods used are reliable.
The expert’s opinion reflects a reliable application of principles to the case’s facts.
Judicial Role: Judges will now decide more frequently, often through Motions in Limine and hearings, whether expert testimony is admissible. The burden lies with the proponent to establish the reliability of information, methods, and opinions presented to the jury. Judges will assess whether the expert applied analytical methods reliably.
Recommendations:
Early Engagement: Engage an experienced and qualified expert early in the process.
Specialization: Choose an expert with specialization relevant to the case.
Citation of Relevant Standards: Ensure that expert reports explicitly cite professional standards and guidelines that drive methodology and final opinions.
By the Numbers: Using Statistical Data in Vocational Rehabilitation
A strong vocational analysis of potential lost earnings requires reliable and trustworthy data to compare the pre-injury to the post-injury earning capacity. The gold standard for assessing earnings is “triangulation.” Triangulation is a statistical assessment that facilitates the validation of data through cross verification from more than two sources. Tax information, pay stubs, and the claimant’s report of earnings (if a child, the parent’s report of earnings) help triangulate likely pre-injury. In order to increase reliability and validity of assessment of earnings, government statistical wages offer information regarding earnings over a wider sample size. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U.S. Department of Labor, and the United States Census Bureau continuously collect information regarding specific occupations and educational attainment with the associated wages.
One of the most useful datasets is the Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) survey. The OEWS includes roughly 830 occupations and wage estimates for those occupations. The OEWS estimates are constructed from a sample of about 1.2 million employers. The earnings are reported by Metropolitan Statistical Areas, by state, or at the national level at the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles. These levels are helpful in determining wages as a function of experience and time.
Another useful dataset is the Population Survey Tables for Personal Incomes (PINC). The PINC data is a collective effort of both the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Census Bureau. The data is organized by educational attainment, gender, race, ethnicity, and amount of time one has worked. The vocational counselor can use this information to assess typical wages for varying educational attainment levels. PINC data is particularly useful in estimating wages for injured minors or others who have not yet established a clear work or earnings history.
By using a broad data set, a claimant’s actual, reported, or anticipated earnings can be compared with the earnings relative to the occupation, geographical area, and educational attainment, or anticipated educational attainment if not for injury. These data sets allow the vocational counselor to assess how the claimant’s wages align with industry standards. By analyzing multiple wage sources, the vocational counselor is able to base their opinions on substantiated data which validates those opinions.
Considering FCEs in Vocational Assessments
A Functional Capacity Evaluation, often called an FCE, is a series of tests to identify an individual's physical abilities, residual functional capabilities, and work tolerances. It is usually conducted over one to two days by trained physical therapists or occupational therapists, and an FCE report is generated with the evaluation's findings.
FCEs help determine whether an individual can return to work in the occupation they held at the time of their injury or if they will need to seek employment in an alternate occupation due to physical limitations. The FCE tests the individual's residual physical strength demand level according to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (i.e., sedentary, light, medium, heavy, or heavy duty). The evaluator assesses the claimant's current residual abilities and whether they match the physical demands of their job or occupation at the time of injury. Should the residual abilities not align with the past job or occupation at the time of injury, the FCE is also helpful in guiding labor market survey research to identify appropriate jobs congruent with the individual's physical restrictions and limitations.
The physical strength demand level should not be the only factor determining an individual's residual employability. The FCE often outlines specific postural demands, environmental conditions, and the individual's ability to work full-time or part-time hours. While the evaluee may be able to perform a particular job or occupation based on the physical strength demand level alone, their postural capabilities, work hours, and/or environmental restrictions may preclude them from working in a particular job or occupation. Environmental restrictions include working from unprotected heights, operating moving machinery, and exposure to vibrations, outdoor conditions, dust, fumes, and gases.
For example, a welder has experienced a work-related burn injury. He tests at a physical strength demand level of medium, which aligns with the required physical demands for this occupation; however, he can only tolerate limited exposure to heat. The occupation of a welder requires frequent exposure to extreme heat. Based on this environmental restriction, welding is no longer a viable occupational option for this individual.
An FCE is useful in determining an individual's physical abilities and work tolerances. All factors in the evaluation should be considered to determine an individual's residual employability, including the physical strength demand level, postural restrictions, environmental restrictions/limitations, and work hour tolerance.
Vocational Assessments and Wage Loss Analyses for Undocumented Workers
As vocational rehabilitation counselors, we are routinely asked to assess the pre- and post-injury earning capacity of individuals who are not legal U.S. citizens. Addressing earning capacity for this population raises issues including whether the individual has a work visa, the impact of immigration status on employment opportunities, as well as educational background and language proficiency. For example, an individual may have worked in the construction industry where English proficiency is less important. A good work ethic, hands-on skills, and the ability to perform in a detailed, accurate manner can make for a valuable employee who can earn desirable wages. If the worker earned substantial wages pre-injury as a construction worker and lost their earning power due to their injuries, it is ultimately the trier (s) of fact to determine appropriate compensation. However, as vocational counselors, we can assist the jury in making that determination.
Documentation of wages earned, such as check stubs or tax returns help corroborate pre-injury capacity. Statistical wages based on generally accepted government data may also add to the pre-injury earnings profile. If physical limitations are outlined by a physician, we can assess their ability to perform past or alternate work and estimate appropriate wages for those occupations. Considering the entire vocational profile including the person’s age, education, work history, transferable skills, language, and citizenship status is crucial when considering alternate work, as the comprehensive profile can heavily impact the worker’s ability to obtain, maintain, and sustain employment.
Barriers to Active Medical Treatment in Life Care Planning
Life care planning involves evaluating a person's future medical needs on a more probable than not basis and developing a plan to meet those needs. The plan may include various services, such as medical care, surgery, rehabilitation, medications, long-term care, adaptive equipment, supplies, and home care. Active treatment can be beneficial in obtaining recommendations for future services; however, common barriers can prevent a patient from actively treating their condition(s).
One common barrier to care is the cost of medical services. Individuals who lack insurance or adequate finances may be unable to afford the out-of-pocket expenses for medical treatments, modalities, and procedures. Due to high costs, patients who lack proper funds to receive ongoing treatment are impacted.
The lack of paid time off or paid leave can complicate care. Treatment for chronic conditions can include frequent office visits, physical therapy visits multiple times weekly, and downtime following pain interventions or surgeries. An individual may not have enough paid leave or time off from work to seek appropriate medical treatment for their condition(s). If the injured party is undergoing treatment and lacks paid time off, they may be forced to choose work and maintain a steady income versus pursuing active treatment.
Another issue may be treatment hesitancy or a fear of future surgical intervention. Treating and consulting providers often recommend surgical intervention for individuals with orthopedic injuries. Even though a patient has been declared a candidate for a surgical procedure and will likely require surgery within their lifetime, they may be hesitant to undergo the treatment. Appropriate patient education of the individual's condition and the risks and benefits of procedures can provide the patient with informed information and assist in future medical treatment and decision making.
Active medical treatment can be an important factor in the development of a life care plan. Consistent follow up assists treating physicians in their medical decision making regarding likely future care. Common barriers can prevent injured patients from pursuing ongoing treatment. A life care plan can provide information for future probable treatment as recommended by either treating or consulting providers even if certain barriers prevent an individual from actively treating their condition(s).
The Standards of Practice and Performance for Life Care Planners
As life care planning continues to evolve, standards of practice and performance continue to be evaluated and revised. The Standards of Practice and Performance for Life Care Planners were updated in September of 2022. The most recent published standards of practice and performance intend to follow an objective, thorough process that is inclusive of as many practitioners of life care planning as feasible (Journal of Life Care Planning, Volume 20, No 3). The standards reflect the growing diversity of professional backgrounds and expertise within the life care planning community. The standards guide the diverse professionals engaged in life care planning with concise, streamlined methodology. The standards include both Standards of Performance and Standards of Practice.
The Standards of Performance are intended to outline competency levels, skills, and behaviors that are expected of a life care planner. They include:
The life care planner has an educational background and professional preparation suitable for life are planning.
The life care planner practices within their professional scope of practice.
The life care planner must have skill and knowledge to understand the health care needs addressed in a life care plan.
The life care planner shall practice in an ethical manner and follow the Code of Ethics of their respective professions, rules, certifications, and credentials.
The life care planner uses the scientific principles of medicine, rehabilitation, and health care as a basis for life care planning.
The life care planner considers cultural and linguistic factors that may influence the assessment, development, and implementation of the plan.
The above Standards of Performance provide ways that the life care planner demonstrates compliance with the below Standards of Practice.
The life care planner facilitates understanding of the life care planning process.
The life care planner establishes working expectations with the referring party.
The life care planner performs a comprehensive assessment through the process of data collection involving multiple elements and sources.
The life care plan analyzes data using a consistent, valid, and reliable process.
The life care planner uses a consistent, valid, and reliable approach to determining the evaluee’s needs.
The life care planner seeks collaboration.
The life care planner uses a consistent, valid, and reliable approach to costs.
The life care planner communicates their opinions.
The life care planner ensures that opinions and work product are congruent, consistent, and follow accepted methodological practices.
The life care planner, as an educator, facilitates understanding of the life care planning process, the life care plan, and work product.
The life care planner may engage in forensic applications.
Following the Standards of Practice and Performance eliminates the potential for adverse outcomes, including the inadmissibility of the life care plan. By following the standards, all life care planners, regardless of professional training or background, have a solid foundation to ensure their work products are credible, usable, valid, and reliable.
Assessing Vocational Capacity of Plaintiffs Receiving Social Security Disability Benefits
When conducting vocational evaluations in personal injury claims, there are instances where the plaintiff is receiving Social Security Disability Income (SSDI) benefits. If the plaintiff has been deemed “disabled” by the Social Security Administration (SSA), the question is whether the individual is permanently disabled from all employment. It is vital to make this assessment in personal injury cases with claims for lost wages or loss of wage-earning capacity.
The Social Security Administration defines disability as “the inability to engage in substantial gainful activity (SGA) due to any medically determinable physical or mental impairment resulting in death or lasting for no less than 12 months.” SGA amounts are usually adjusted annually, with the 2023 amounts for non-blind individuals set at $1,470.00 monthly. Those awarded SSDI benefits can still attempt to work and continue to receive benefits if their earnings do not exceed the SGA amount.
It is necessary to understand the medical basis of SSA’s determination of disability. For many plaintiffs, the award of disability may be based on a combination of impairments that rendered them disabled and not a specific injury or incident, which vocational experts must consider in personal injury claims. For example, a motor vehicle collision resulting in neck or back injuries may limit an individual to sedentary or light-level work. There may also be pre-existing conditions such as diabetes, heart problems, and depression (exacerbated after the MVC), which SSA will consider in evaluating the person’s overall claim for disability. Disability status may be based on multiple impairments and not solely on the injuries to the neck and back.
Another factor is that a plaintiff receiving Social Security benefits may be rendered disabled for a closed period. For example, medical evidence documents that spine surgery was recently performed, and a recovery period of 12-24 months is medically necessary per the records of the treating or consultative physician. Benefits may be awarded for a specified time (closed period). SSA will re-evaluate the claim to determine if significant medical improvement will allow them to perform some substantial gainful activity. In this instance, the disability status is considered temporary.
The SSA’s determination of the claimant’s ability to work is equally important. In addition to any specific restrictions or limitations that may be assigned, transferable skills become a significant factor after the age of fifty. For example, claimants limited to sedentary-level work who do not possess transferable skills for sedentary employment in the regional or national economy may be awarded benefits even though they may be capable of working in unskilled, sedentary occupations.
When evaluating a personal injury case for potential lost wages/loss of wage-earning capacity where the plaintiff receives SSDI benefits, we do not assume the plaintiff is totally disabled from all work. A thorough evaluation by a vocational expert can benefit by offering opinions concerning the vocational outlook, employability, and earning capacity of the plaintiff.
What Is A Life Care Plan? Breaking Down The Definition, Part 2:
To recap Part 1, the definition of a life care plan is “a dynamic document based upon published standards of practice, comprehensive assessment, data analysis, and research, which provides an organized, concise plan for current and future needs with associated costs for individuals who have experienced catastrophic injury or have chronic health care needs.” The term dynamic was discussed. The second part of the definition states that a life care plan is “based upon published standards of practice, comprehensive assessment, data analysis, and research which provides an organized, concise plan for current and future needs with associated costs.” So, what exactly does this mean?
Certified life care planners abide by published standards of practice, with the most recent standards being the 4th Edition, published on November 3, 2022, in the Journal of Life Care Planning. These standards guide the work of life care planners from various disciplines, whether providing life care planning services locally, regionally, nationally, or internationally. The published standards outline expectations of those practicing life care planning and provide a means for evaluating the quality of work practices and work product.
According to the Standards, life care planners should conduct a comprehensive assessment of the evaluee and note if an interview did not occur. Life care planners collect data regarding health/medical, biopsychosocial, financial, educational, and vocational history and current treatment needs. Life Care Planners also gather information from relevant treating and consulting allied health professionals. The assessment can help the life care planner determine the need for additional evaluations and expert opinions. Life Care Planners analyze all relevant data using a consistent method to assess the evaluee’s needs and to identify current functioning, disability, and health, supporting future medical care recommendations. Age, geographical location, and gender are other factors that should be considered when formulating a life care plan.
Life care planners conduct research to determine appropriate costs for recommended items and services. When performing research in developing a life care plan, the life care planner must use a consistent method to determine costs for various categories of available/needed services. The costs should be geographically relevant and identified from reliable sources. The life care planner should use a consistent method for organizing and interpreting data for projecting costs, and the cost research should be presented clearly.
Standards of practice help to guide life care planners, the assessment and analysis provide determining factors, and the cost research for current and future care needs define what life care planners need to produce an accurate and reliable product.
Vocational Rehabilitation Considerations in Burn Cases
Many factors influence the vocational prognosis of individuals who have experienced burn injuries, including residual functional limitations, the environment of the job(s), the need for ongoing scar revision and treatment/therapies, and unique clothing needs/requirements. These should all be considered when determining an individual’s ability to return to work.
The first step in vocational planning is to assess the level and nature of residual impairments. For example, many individuals with burn injuries experience scarring and contractures, which can impact their range of motion, especially in the joints. If burns are to the upper extremities, grasping, handling, and reaching issues can further affect the likelihood of returning to work. Facial burns can also be a deterrent when working in customer-facing roles or in an interview setting with potential employers. Treatment typically involves various types of therapies, which could also affect their ability to maintain employment due to frequently missing work because of appointments.
The physical environment where the individual was working pre-injury should also be considered when determining if a position fits within post-injury limitations. People with burn injuries usually cannot return to work in environments that require outdoor work, exposure to high temperatures, open flames, and chemicals. These restrictions typically rule out many welding jobs, construction jobs, or other occupations requiring outdoor work.
Unique clothing is often needed to protect an individual’s skin following a burn injury. This clothing may or may not be compatible with other clothing requirements outlined by an employer. The vocational counselor can be integral in determining if any accommodations need to be made in the workplace to allow for the clothing necessary to return to work.
A vocational rehabilitation counselor should know the factors that must be addressed when working with individuals who have experienced burn injuries. The counselor should consider the impairment and any restrictions of the individual, the need for ongoing treatment and therapy, environmental aspects of the job, and special clothing requirements needed when determining an individual’s ability to return to work.
The Importance of Updated Records for a Life Care Planner and Vocational Expert
Typically, the first step after being engaged as life care planning or vocational experts is to review the available records. Medical records guide the direction of the life care plan and frame potential restrictions that influence vocational assessment. Step two in the process is the evaluation with the plaintiff to determine which treating or consulting providers with whom to confer. Occasionally, evaluees have difficulty recalling important treatment history, and documentary evidence becomes even more essential.
Occasionally, the medical documentation will contain information about pre-existing treatment, which assists the expert in determining if a recommendation is appropriate for a life care plan or if future treatment needs would be related in whole or part to a pre-existing condition.
Having the most recent medical reports before a physician conference is essential to understand the recommendations better and know if the physician and life care plan expert should discuss specific topics.
It is also helpful to have updated medical documentation and treatment records even after a consultation has taken place. The physician may alter their treatment plan during treatment, which could affect the life care plan recommendations. Therefore, receiving updated medical documentation and treatment records before court appearances or depositions is essential, as the physician’s new medical opinions may justify an updated assessment and report. Providing updated records promptly should ensure the life care planner has time to review the updated information and possibly re-consult with the physician, if necessary. Updated medical documentation is also essential when the life care planner and vocational expert are not permitted or able to evaluate the plaintiff.
Equally crucial to medical documentation are deposition transcripts of treating and consulting physicians. These depositions can contain many treatment recommendations or opinions that confirm or deny information required to complete a life care plan or aid in writing vocational opinions.
In conclusion, referral sources can assist the life care planner and vocational expert by ensuring they receive updated medical documentation, reports, and deposition transcripts of physicians as soon as possible to supply the most accurate, up-to-date information.
Costing Techniques Lessons from the Life Care Planning Summit
The International Association of Life Care Planners (IALCP) is the Life Care Planning section of the International Association of Rehabilitation Professionals and arguably one of the most active life care planning professional organizations. For 22 years, the IALCP has facilitated Life Care Planning Summits to foster collaboration and consensus on standards of practice in the field. For example, in May of 2022, seven representatives of Stokes & Associates participated in the most recent Summit, which intended to develop a position statement regarding the presentation of charges or costs in a life care plan. Over time, similar Summits have resulted in the seminal resources we rely on as life care planners, including the Consensus and Majority Statements.
In preparation for the Summit, Dr. Jamie Pomeranz and Dr. Nami Yu collected survey data from active life care planning professionals regarding typical costing strategies for generating life care plans. Data was collected via Survey Monkey, and 264 life care planners completed the survey (80% response rate). Results of the survey were presented at the 2022 Summit and recently published in the Journal of Life Care Planning (Johnson, C.B., Pomeranz, J.L., Yu, N.S., Robert, E., Davis, E., Woodard, L. & Penilton, D. 2022 Life care planning summit: Costing techniques, survey results and development of a costing framework in support of the life care planning specialty. Journal of Life Care Planning, 21(1), 31-68).
Below are some significant findings:
Overall, respondents were quite experienced, with 64% writing life care plans for ten or more years and 39% for over 20 years.
64% of the sample reported a Certified Life Care Planner (CLCP) as the primary certification related to life care planning; Certified Nurse Life Care Planner (CNLCP) 22%; Certified Rehabilitation Counselor (CRC) 21%, and Certified Case Manager (CCM) 18%.
42% of life care planners obtain fees and prices by telephone 81% to 100% of the time.
62% of life care planners use a database to determine costs 81% to 100% of the time.
Most life care planners (81%) use a combination of sources to determine costs 81% to 100% of the time.
93% of life care planners identify the sources of the costs in their plans 80% to 100% of the time.
43% of life care planners who use databases for costs report the 75th percentile; 22% report the 80th percentile.
64% of plans do not rely on Medicare fee schedules to determine costs.
51% of life care planners consider prices less than 12 months old valid.
As life care planners, learning that we generally agree with our colleagues regarding actual best practices was encouraging and validating. The most current edition of the Standards of Practice for Life Care Planners (2022, Journal of Life Care Planning, 20(3), 5-24) provides strong guidance regarding general principles and minimum standards for clinical practice. However, as evident from the survey results, there is much room for interpretation of the guidelines. Stokes & Associates strives to employ peer-reviewed and generally accepted methods in the field. The published results from this most recent survey strongly support our company-wide methodology for generating life care plans.
Back to our Roots
When composing our monthly newsletter, we attempt to educate readers on the practice of Vocational Rehabilitation and Life Care Planning. This month, however, we would like to elicit your input. In response to last month's email newsletter, we were contacted by readers who gave us feedback about how our services impact decisions and outcomes in the litigation process. This sharing of information is essential. Therefore, to keep an open dialogue, we offer information from the Tenets of Life Care Planning and ask if you have a comment or question, don't hesitate to contact us. We welcome the exchange.
Tenet - "All plan recommendations should relate to patient-specific evaluation data. Each recommendation must be carefully tied to the data collected in the clinical interview, the history taken with the patient and family, and the review of all medical/health-related professional records. The basis for each item citation should be clear to others who review the life care plan. No one should be left to wonder why specific recommendations were made."
Discussion - Breaking this down means that all life care plan recommendations must also be related to the specific indexed incident or event that causes the need for the recommendations. The word "all" is emphasized because of its high importance. This tenet insists that no opinion or recommendation can be omitted if it can be tied back to the case, regardless of who generated it, unless it is outside the scope of practice. This tenet compels the consideration of recommendations, whether from treating or consulting physicians, plaintiff, or defense. Life care planners are not in a position to challenge a recommendation's validity on that basis.
The life care planner should also consider general medical conditions that require treatment but are not included in the plan if unrelated to the event. Physicians struggle with differentiating included items as they are generally in the practice of treating the patient as a whole. We consistently inform treating and consulting physicians or allied health professionals that we include treatment recommendations only if they are causally related to the indexed event. This tenet requires the basis for inclusion to be reported in the plan, which we accomplish by attributing recommendations to the professional who made them in the comment section of the life care plan.